id=8d8e2c27bcaa121d6ee0de4b98774bb4' type='text/javascript'/>

Friday, September 14, 2012

Lamarck vs Darwin on Woodpeckers

What would Lamarck have said about a woodpecker's cushioned head? And how would Darwin have replied? A hypothetical conversation:

Lamarck: Bonjour Charles!

Darwin: Cheerio Jean-Baptiste!

Lamarck: Ze woodpecker is a hard-headed old fellow no?

Darwin: Yes, thanks to natural selection.

Lamarck: Aah mon ami (shaking head dubiously). I say it is due to using his head over and over again to make holes in ze trees! He uses it and uses it and develops a cushioning layer from all this use. That cushion protects him. His little baby woodpecker inherits it from him no?

Darwin: Jean-Baptiste, you have made a mistake. The woodpecker inherits the cushioned head as follows:

Imagine a large population of woodpeckers. Some have well-cushioned heads, some have less-cushioned heads.

Woodpeckers with well-cushioned heads can peck holes in trees more effectively than woodpeckers with less-cushioned heads. This enabled the woodpeckers with well-cushioned heads to survive better during times of low food supply than their less-cushioned counterparts.

The woodpeckers with well-cushioned heads have a trait that helps them survive longer. This makes them more attractive to female woodpeckers. And as a result, they reproduce more.

No comments:

Post a Comment